Friday, August 3, 2012
I didn't follow up on the Glock thing right away. I got it back after they updated it and refinished the slide, it looked nice. It functioned brilliantly. But I eventually got bored of it. I like Glock, but I'm not fanatical about them. I sold it and bought a Romanian AK, and then in early 2011 I bought an Israeli issue Browning Hi Power, made by Fabrique Nationale, and I still have and enjoy that one.
I do have a baby Glock 26 9mm that I carry around it it's served me well.
I do have a baby Glock 26 9mm that I carry around it it's served me well.
I appreciate all the pageviews I have got since I opened this blog, but since I can't cover the news anywhere near as fast as the major publications, and I have tons of hobbies and my regular life that I attend to, that I can't do much of anything for this blog, but I will keep it up in its current state.
Friday, September 2, 2011
It's been a long time since I posted on my blog. It's rather hard for me to do reviews and stuff like that because they already have been done. Instead I can relate about my experience and give thoughtful opinion. Last year I bought a baby Glock 26 in 9mm, I like it. I choose to carry it. Then last summer I built an FAL battle rifle from a brand new Argentina built kit (minus receiver), bought the receiver from DSA, a good friend of mine and I put it together, and I've been working rounds through it. It's my second, the first was a Century International Arms built one, and it was far from perfect. This one is superb and shoots fantastic. Then earlier this year, I bought a former Israel Police duty Browning High Power, made by Fabrique Nationale in Beligium, with the commander style hammer. Some wear adding to character, but a beautiful pistol. It was manufactured in 1969, and was told that it may not like hollow points (many handguns didn't get the throating treatment until the '80s when hollow points were getting closer to perfection), but I haven't had an issue. So that's pretty much the update.
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
I bought a second generation Glock model 17, looked it up and it was manufactured in 1994 I think it is. Got it for really cheap, I think some of the members of the shop I bought it from have overall mixed feelings of Glock, but I don't take it seriously because most come from a traditional point of view regarding handguns, such as 1911 and .45, the 'best combination there is.' Something like that. I highly respect that. However, polymer is no mere plastic. Its just a new and different way to make a potent, reliable firearm. But since it was second hand with quite a bit of holster wear, it had character and some wear. I cleaned it well, but time after time of targetshooting, the feeling I was getting as it recoiled was getting worse. Then I had heard about some of the services Glock performs for really reasonable, such as refinishing the slide to factory look, and that they do a free inspection, I figured that is the way to go. So I sent it in last week, I hope to hear from them soon about how it's going.
Monday, November 24, 2008
The Short Magazine Lee Enfield (SMLE) combat military rifle had seen service for over 60 years, starting right at the turn of the century. The British had learned hard and quick that when they went into battle with the Boers in South Africa that the early Mauser rifles were superior to early Enfields........(read part 2)
One of the major problems was the mismatch in sizes made for different troops. Early Enfields that still accomadated black powder were taken out of the equasion, and the Lee Enfield was made one universal length. When the Mk. III hit The Great War (WWI), many didn't think it was any better, but since it was stuck in the middle of battle, there was no looking back. Once the Germans advanced, the Lee Enfield showed its newfound superority. The bolt action was rugged and smooth, and exceptionally quick. It was soon found that British soldiers could fire what was called "The Mad Minute." The Mad Minute was 30 rounds in one minute fired at their enemy, some could fire more than that. The rate of fire from one rifle could rival that of an automatic fired weapon. This rate of fire from many British soldiers would decimate German troop advances.
Many versions have been built through many different eras, but the same rugged, reliable, accurate basis of a rifle was still there. Even though the British would eventually go with a large caliber battle rifle, and then a small rifle caliber assault rifle, some would say that none are completely much better than a good 'ol infantry bolt action at the hands of a good rifleman. For all the history, and characteristics the rifle has to offer, I plan on adding one to my collection.
Thursday, October 16, 2008
I'd rather not get into politics here in my blog much, however I feel that whos going to be in office soon may have an impact on your right to keep and bear arms. I seriously hope there aren't any firearms enthusiasts who are voting for Obama. I don't think people know the half of what they are voting for if they have Obama in mind. He has consistently voted time and time again for gun bans and ammunition bans, while giving you the campaign talk that he wont do anything with firearms rights, or lately talks about what is "reasonable." His version of "reasonable" restrictions are that you only have single shot guns. If thats so, whats the point? Be careful who you vote for. The second amendment is the foundation of most of what everything in our country is laid upon, and without it, all the other promisses one may make are just securities without liberties.
Saturday, June 7, 2008
The New Springfield XDm is available(The M Factor), which is a new edition and advancement over the previous Xd, which was already innovative. I had an XD 40, and as a lot of people know, they had a chamber indicator, a striker indicator, and a trigger safety detent like a Glock. And they have a grip that was built to be comfortable, and in my opinion, even more comfortable than Glock. The XD was built from scratch to be tough, reliable, robust and exceptionally accurate. And they are. (read Part 2)
I like both the Glock line and the XD line pretty equally, but at the time I got the 40, I shot a 9mm version and it was unusually snappy compared to the Glock, so I tried the 40 and it had a smooth recoil. But honestly, I don't have any sort of problems with any of the XDs. And the XD45 came out with an unheard of 13+1 capacity in the behemoth .45 ACP cartridge. Glock, do you have a response? Now, I don't have a picture of it to post, I just could not find one, but one will be posted at some point. But I will point out that the new M factor has a smoother slide look than the old XD, which was a stepped fashion, kind of like a Sig with broad shoulders. For me, that looks better, plus they come with a match grade barrel (as if the old XD wasn't good enough *sarcasm*). More details as they come.
Friday, May 9, 2008
1911s are great all around guns. Its been around for almost 100 years, designed by the Albert Eignstein of firearms development, John M. Browning. Originally assigned to Colt for mass production, today there are countless brands who say they are the best. I at this moment don't exactly have a favorite. When I get one, I know it will be a mid-length or a commander length, and it will be more of an elegance piece, since the Glock is my reliable no frills pistol. So I'm going to leave this up to you. Please tell me what brand 1911 is your favorite, and why that is. You have Kimber, Colt, Para Ordnance, Springfield, Wilson Combat, Smith & Wesson, and many more. And please be serious.
Thursday, March 6, 2008
I am getting bored of the usual guns for sale. I have an AR15, I love them, but I know there are new cutting edge designs. The issues with the AR/M16/M4 are the gas system which are sensitive to fine particles such as the Mesopotamian sand. The charging handle is on the rear which is rather uncomfortable. The industry seems to be blindly fixated on the M16 class, when I know many people who are hungry for something new. The AR boasts some great features, but they are all technically 40 years old, and lets face it, the flat top reciever is not new. There is a reason it was called MIL-STD 1913, since its design was created in 1913. The difference is much of firearms took 8 decades to implement it. I'm not a rich person, but I'd say if its under $2000, I could feasably foam at the mouth and ready myself to afford one. I would like to see the Magpul Masada offered semi-auto and at your local dealer. I would like to see the HK G36 in a semi-auto configuration and offered at your local dealer. I would like to see space age, but reasonably affordable designs competing for my dollar. For now, all I can do is dream and wait.